CO129-312 - Acting Governor Major Gen Sir Gascoigne Governor Sir Blake - 1902 [7-9] — Page 170

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Thu

had the advantage of offacing Opinion of Sir H. Blake, who incurred

in the grant.

lost

REA1619

I should not

the

argue

matter,

simply refer to previous despatches and say

that Major Chapman's action

I

was improper. [There must be some principle plainly balanced in this despatch]

Lid

M. Stubb

5.779/16/0

Major Chapman ever

whether

01

bring

to our notice the terms on which

the Contingent

were sent as embodied

in the Colonial Secretary's letter?

Or did he do so? CPF

Ar Hous-

Shell received no

7

what noti

f

their Glmy.

12.050" the additional expense Who heard nothing except to Exactly imperially" Pro is cloudy not constant

16003

with the grant of

Free command £1342.7. the allowance. refund & the enclosort her wor

Il ca. paid Major Charente Parangi!) liis accounts to be audited direct to the lol fort.

Mr Lucas

BM

we should I think inform Gov, that Major Wharfman did not ask for

these allowances but that they were granted

14&L(k)—50654-3000-12-01

54040--3000-3-02

168

by the S. f S after consulting Sir H. Blake for the reason given.

33006;

I add

that

on the desk had not

previously been info. of the allowances referred to in the reference to this letter, I

sustenance

that he considers that the allowance

of 7/6 per day to officer referred

to

par 2 thereof should

not be given in addition to the

allowances

(m 24647)+

O

that in accounts for the

by Major Chakman from

maunty

this account.

dins read the Ca to £1392~7?

a

? the sustenance allowance

if drawn in addition, must be refunded.

GUR2079C.Pd.20

at once

Edit History

2026-06-01 10:52:48 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Thu had the advantage of offacing Opinion of Sir H. Blake, who incurred in the grant. lost REA1619 I should not the argue matter, simply refer to previous despatches and say that Major Chapman's action I was improper. [There must be some principle plainly balanced in this despatch] Lid M. Stubb 5.779/16/0 Major Chapman ever whether 01 bring to our notice the terms on which the Contingent were sent as embodied in the Colonial Secretary's letter? Or did he do so? CPF Ar Hous- Shell received no 7 what noti f their Glmy. 12.050" the additional expense Who heard nothing except to Exactly imperially" Pro is cloudy not constant 16003 with the grant of Free command £1342.7. the allowance. refund & the enclosort her wor Il ca. paid Major Charente Parangi!) liis accounts to be audited direct to the lol fort. Mr Lucas BM we should I think inform Gov, that Major Wharfman did not ask for these allowances but that they were granted 14&L(k)—50654-3000-12-01 54040--3000-3-02 168 by the S. f S after consulting Sir H. Blake for the reason given. 33006; I add that on the desk had not previously been info. of the allowances referred to in the reference to this letter, I sustenance that he considers that the allowance of 7/6 per day to officer referred to par 2 thereof should not be given in addition to the allowances (m 24647)+ O that in accounts for the by Major Chakman from maunty this account. dins read the Ca to £1392~7? a ? the sustenance allowance if drawn in addition, must be refunded. GUR2079C.Pd.20 at once
Baseline (Original)
Thu had the advantage of offacing Opinion of Sir H. Blake, who incurred in the grant. lost REA 1619 I should not the argue matter, simply refer to previous despertches and bay that Major Chapman's action I improper. [ There must be some princk pique balined this despatch] Lid M. Stubb 5.779/16/0 Major Chapman ever www ther 01 bring to our notice the terms on which the Contingent Did the were sent as embodied in the Colonial Secretary's letter? Orgever do so? CPF Ar Hous- Shell received no 7 wat nuti f their Glmy. 12.050" he additional expense Woo hoord nothing except to Exally imperially" Pron is clody not constant 16003 ་་ with thangrant of kru of Free mmand £1342.7. the alinrame. rofund & the enclosort her wor Il ca. paid major Charente Parangi !) liis accounts to be undurch direct to the lol fort. Mr Lucas BM we should I think inform Gov, that Major Wharfman did not ask for these allowances but that they were granted 14&L (k)—50654-3000-12-01 54040--3000-3-02 168 by the. S. f S after consueting dis to Blake for the reason given. 33006; I add that desk on the too had not previously bear info. of the allowances referred to in the ence to this letter, I sustenance that he considers that the allowan of 7/6 her day to facer referred to par 2 chereof should not be given in addition to the sandd in desh 195 allowances (m 24647)+ O that in accounty for the by Major Chakman from maunty this account. dins read the Ca to £1392~Y? a ? the sustenance allon if drawn in addition, must be refunded. gur 2079 C.Pd. 20 at once
2026-06-01 10:52:48 · Baseline
View content

Thu

had the advantage of offacing Opinion of Sir H. Blake, who incurred

in the grant.

lost

REA 1619

I should not

the

argue

matter,

simply refer to previous despertches and bay

that Major Chapman's action

I

improper. [ There must be some princk pique balined this despatch]

Lid

M. Stubb

5.779/16/0

Major Chapman ever

www ther

01

bring

to our notice the terms on which

the Contingent

Did the

were sent as embodied

in the Colonial Secretary's letter?

Orgever do so? CPF

Ar Hous-

Shell received no

7

wat nuti

f

their Glmy.

12.050" he additional expense Woo hoord nothing except to Exally imperially" Pron is clody not constant

16003

་་

with thangrant of

kru

of Free mmand £1342.7. the alinrame. rofund & the enclosort her wor

Il ca. paid major Charente Parangi !) liis accounts to be undurch direct to the lol fort.

Mr Lucas

BM

we should I think inform Gov, that Major Wharfman did not ask for

these allowances but that they were granted

14&L (k)—50654-3000-12-01

54040--3000-3-02

168

by the. S. f S after consueting dis to

Blake for the reason given.

33006;

I add

that

desk on

the too had not

previously bear info. of the allowances referred to in the ence to this letter, I

sustenance

that he considers that the allowan

of 7/6 her day to facer referred

to

par 2 chereof should

not be given in addition to the

sandd in desh 195

allowances

(m 24647)+

O

that in accounty for the

by Major Chakman from

maunty

this account.

dins read the Ca to £1392~Y?

a

? the sustenance allon

if drawn in addition, must be refunded.

gur 2079 C.Pd. 20

at once

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.